6

Don’t Facebook & text during class, email instead

Posted by reyjunco on November 27, 2012 in Research |

Facebook and texting related to poorer gradesMy most recent paper on multitasking, In-class multitasking and academic performance, has uncovered some interesting results. I conducted a survey of 1,839 college students and asked them how often they multitask during class by using Facebook, texting, emailing, searching for content not related to the class, IMing, and talking on the phone. I also collected students’ actual overall GPAs for the semester in which the study was conducted. In this post, I’ll only focus on the high frequency and moderate frequency activities:

Texting was a high frequency activity: 69% of students reported texting during class.

Using Facebook, searching for content not related to the class, and emailing were moderate frequency activities: 28% of students said they used Facebook during class, 28% of students said they used email during class, and 21% of students said they searched for content during class.

Here’s where it gets interesting: Using Facebook and texting during class were significantly negatively related to overall semester GPA after controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, and Internet skill. However, emailing and searching during class were not related to GPA.

While incongruent with the literature on multitasking in the field of cognitive science, the results are congruent with recent research finding comparable results. In a similar study, Shelia Cotten and I found that using Facebook and texting while doing schoolwork were negatively associated with overall college GPA while emailing, searching, talking on the phone, and instant messaging were not. Furthermore, an experimental study by Wood et al. (2012) found that students who used Facebook while attending to a lecture scored significantly lower on tests of lecture material than those who were only allowed to take notes using paper and pencil; however, the scores of students who texted, emailed or sent IMs did not differ significantly from students in control groups.

What is going on?

While further research is warranted, I’ve got a few hypotheses: First, there may be something about the technologies themselves that leads to poorer outcomes. Second, it is possible that the discrepancies in outcomes may lie in the nature of how the technologies are used and the frequency with which they are employed. For instance, Rosen et al. (2011) found that students who sent and received the most number of text messages while watching a lecture video scored lower on a test of the lecture material than those who sent the least number of messages; however, there was no difference in scores between the group of students who sent the middle amount of messages and the other groups. My final hypothesis to explain the discrepancy between Facebook and texting and the other technologies is related to the activities students engage in while using each. For instance, my research has shown that how Facebook is used is a better predictor of academic outcomes than how much time is spent on the site.

Limitations

The standard correlation vs. causation limitations apply: this is a cross-sectional and correlational design and more research is certainly warranted. While the sample on which this research was based was representative of the overall university population, it may not be representative of all institutions in the United States. The fact that participants were recruited via email and that the survey was administered online could have biased the sample towards students who regularly use email (and perhaps who multitask more). A final limitation was that the frequency with which students multitask during class was assessed via self report.

Image credit: anna-b http://www.flickr.com/photos/anna-b/3218868484/

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/StephanieKiba Stephanie Kiba

    Were
    Facebook users, texters, emailers using the given technology to search
    course content, to connect with classroom peers, or to socially connect
    with outside peers? When
    I was a student, I would IM, Facebook, and email during class, however,
    I know most of my technology use was to communicate with my classroom
    peers and share notes. If some students use technology to connect with
    peers and share notes, I can see how
    there may be a difference in gpa within “Facebook Users” or “Texters”
    groups. A student sending 100 texts about a party may have a different
    gpa than a student texting about notes or studying.

  • http://blog.reyjunco.com/ Rey Junco

    Unfortunately, I don’t have the data to make a distinction between educational and non-educational uses of Facebook and texting. Although professors at the university where this study was conducted did not use Facebook or mobile in their courses, we can’t assume that all of such uses were non-academic. It’s a great topic for further research! 

  • http://twitter.com/Laura_Gerth Laura Gerth

    Did your survey look at google chat or twitter at all? If a school uses Google for their official email system, I wonder how many students are using Google chat instead of an actual email message to communicate, and how that might change the results. 

  • http://blog.reyjunco.com/ Rey Junco

    This study did not examine Twitter or Google chat. I used the generic “instant messaging” wording in the survey. Also, this university was not a Google school. It would be interesting to know if GChat displaces (some) email for Google schools. 

  • Saichem_377

    if a person use facebook in between lecture in danish school hw will be ist time warned and next time he will be said good bye

  • Rajesh-45

    if a person use facebook in between lecture in danish school hw will be ist time warned and next time he will be said good bye

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise specified, all content on this blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

This site is using the Junco Child-Theme, v2.0.2, on top of
the Parent-Theme Desk Mess Mirrored, v2.0.4, from BuyNowShop.com.